By Mark Brousseau
While the Federal Reserve Bank’s latest figures show that electronic payments continue to achieve strong growth, the data also suggests we’re still a long way off from the eagerly-anticipated “checkless” society.
With 28.8 billion checks written in 2010 -- the last year the Federal Reserve researched -- the number of checks written between 2007 and 2010 declined by about 6 percent per year. What’s more, 92 percent of checks are now cleared electronically between U.S. banks, according to the Federal Reserve’s research.
So what should remittance processors make of this data?
“It’s clear that U.S. check volumes continue to decline at a gradual rate,” says Creditron Founder and CEO Wally Vogel, “But checks are not likely to disappear any time soon.” While those might be sobering words from some paper-weary operations managers, they can take heart in the fact that paper deposits – a drag on costs and efficiency – are experiencing a rapid decline as Check 21 emerges as the method of choice for deposits (Vogel points to NACHA figures showing a big drop in Accounts Receivable Check Conversion volumes). “This is bad news for manufacturers of high-volume check encoding equipment, but it’s a great opportunity for providers of Check 21 remote deposit technology. There are many remittance shops that manually process their transactions, or have outdated solutions that don’t support Check 21. With banks continuing to lower their fees for Check 21 deposits, many of these shops will likely look for electronic solutions.”
Vogel notes that Creditron has recently seen strong demand for its Check 21 remote deposit capabilities. “The market is recognizing the value of remittance solutions that offer Check 21 remote deposit, as well as an image-based workflow. Against this backdrop, I think we are well-positioned for success and growth.”
What do you think?
Showing posts with label check image exchange. Show all posts
Showing posts with label check image exchange. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Same-day ACH suffering from “chicken and the egg” syndrome?
By Mark Brousseau
With remote deposit capture continuing to enjoy strong growth, some attendees at this week’s NACHA Payments conference in Austin, Texas, were left wondering what has become of same-day Automated Clearing House (ACH) transactions – the hottest (and arguably most controversial) topic at NACHA Payments a few years back. The answer may be sobering for those who thought same-day ACH would be a clearly more appealing alternative to the same-day availability afforded by remote capture.
“The lack of same-day availability has always been a weakness of ACH,” notes Affirmative Technologies Chief Technology Officer George Bassous.
“Same-day ACH should be a magic bullet when it comes to turning back the rising volume of deposits made via Check 21 remote capture,” he says. “After all, Check 21 remote capture is a case of moving forward by taking two steps back: in order to get same-day availability, it requires the biller to continue dealing with checks.”
Bassous says there are a lot of advantages to same-day ACH. Chief among them, he said, is the ability to know much sooner whether a transaction is being returned. “Virtually any biller would be very interested in same-day ACH,” Bassous claimed.
So why hasn’t same-day ACH had better traction, much less driven back the growth of Check 21 remote capture transactions? “The issue is that the systems used by the ACH banks – particularly large ones – are so tied into old technology that when something new like same-day ACH comes along, they can’t do anything about it. This is the same issue that Secure Vault Payments is having. The situation with same-day ACH is a classic case of ‘chicken and the egg,’” Bassous explained.
Bassous doesn’t buy the argument that some banks won’t offer same-day ACH because they are afraid of cannibalizing their lucrative wire transfer volumes: “I haven’t heard that from banks and I think cards would be the bigger threat there.”
The bottom line is that many banks are not set-up for same-day ACH.
What do you think?
With remote deposit capture continuing to enjoy strong growth, some attendees at this week’s NACHA Payments conference in Austin, Texas, were left wondering what has become of same-day Automated Clearing House (ACH) transactions – the hottest (and arguably most controversial) topic at NACHA Payments a few years back. The answer may be sobering for those who thought same-day ACH would be a clearly more appealing alternative to the same-day availability afforded by remote capture.
“The lack of same-day availability has always been a weakness of ACH,” notes Affirmative Technologies Chief Technology Officer George Bassous.
“Same-day ACH should be a magic bullet when it comes to turning back the rising volume of deposits made via Check 21 remote capture,” he says. “After all, Check 21 remote capture is a case of moving forward by taking two steps back: in order to get same-day availability, it requires the biller to continue dealing with checks.”
Bassous says there are a lot of advantages to same-day ACH. Chief among them, he said, is the ability to know much sooner whether a transaction is being returned. “Virtually any biller would be very interested in same-day ACH,” Bassous claimed.
So why hasn’t same-day ACH had better traction, much less driven back the growth of Check 21 remote capture transactions? “The issue is that the systems used by the ACH banks – particularly large ones – are so tied into old technology that when something new like same-day ACH comes along, they can’t do anything about it. This is the same issue that Secure Vault Payments is having. The situation with same-day ACH is a classic case of ‘chicken and the egg,’” Bassous explained.
Bassous doesn’t buy the argument that some banks won’t offer same-day ACH because they are afraid of cannibalizing their lucrative wire transfer volumes: “I haven’t heard that from banks and I think cards would be the bigger threat there.”
The bottom line is that many banks are not set-up for same-day ACH.
What do you think?
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Sputtering Check Conversion
By Mark Brousseau
While the latest statistics from Herndon, VA-based NACHA show that overall Automated Clearing House (ACH) volumes increased slightly in 2009 (2.6 percent compared to 2008 activity), Accounts Receivable Check (ARC) Conversion -- once the darling of remittance operations -- decreased by more than 10 percent during the same period. In 2009, there were approximately 2.4 billion ARC transactions, NACHA reports, compared to nearly 2.7 billion ARC transactions the previous year.
The drop in ARC volumes comes as no surprise to Creditron, Inc., Founder and CEO Wally Vogel (wvogel@creditron.com). Vogel expects ARC volumes to continue to fall as consumers move away from writing checks for recurring remittances and towards electronic mechanisms such as Internet-initiated payments (which registered a stout 9.7 percent volume increase in 2009, NACHA reports).
Vogel says that, "As far as we have seen, ARC is not really going anywhere among mid-volume processors. Our clients are either moving to Check 21 or staying with what they have. Many clients don't perceive a significant cost benefit if they already have an automated encoding solution."
Vogel adds that Creditron is seeing "slow but steady growth in Check 21 among its current clients, and virtually all of its new installations include Check 21. The biggest reason our clients are reluctant to implement ARC is the notification requirement, which isn't a factor if they go with Check 21."
What are you seeing?
While the latest statistics from Herndon, VA-based NACHA show that overall Automated Clearing House (ACH) volumes increased slightly in 2009 (2.6 percent compared to 2008 activity), Accounts Receivable Check (ARC) Conversion -- once the darling of remittance operations -- decreased by more than 10 percent during the same period. In 2009, there were approximately 2.4 billion ARC transactions, NACHA reports, compared to nearly 2.7 billion ARC transactions the previous year.
The drop in ARC volumes comes as no surprise to Creditron, Inc., Founder and CEO Wally Vogel (wvogel@creditron.com). Vogel expects ARC volumes to continue to fall as consumers move away from writing checks for recurring remittances and towards electronic mechanisms such as Internet-initiated payments (which registered a stout 9.7 percent volume increase in 2009, NACHA reports).
Vogel says that, "As far as we have seen, ARC is not really going anywhere among mid-volume processors. Our clients are either moving to Check 21 or staying with what they have. Many clients don't perceive a significant cost benefit if they already have an automated encoding solution."
Vogel adds that Creditron is seeing "slow but steady growth in Check 21 among its current clients, and virtually all of its new installations include Check 21. The biggest reason our clients are reluctant to implement ARC is the notification requirement, which isn't a factor if they go with Check 21."
What are you seeing?
Friday, April 23, 2010
Small businesses eye mobile remote deposit capture
Posted by Mark Brousseau
One in four consumers and 39 percent of small businesses desire mobile remote deposit capture (mobile RDC), a technology that allows an image of a check to be deposited through a camera-equipped mobile phone. That's according to new research from Javelin Strategy & Research. A niche product in 2010, small banks and credit unions are the first to offer mobile RDC to identified trusted consumers as a way to retain customers and grow without reliance on branches.
Per the Mobile Remote Deposit Capture report, smartphones are a key factor in the adoption of Mobile RDC. Consumers need access to the mobile web and the ability to take a two-megapixel digital picture with their camera phone. “If one of the largest financial institutions in the U.S. – Bank of America, Chase, Citibank or Wells Fargo – offers mobile remote deposit capture, you will most likely see a domino effect of the other banks offering the service,” said James Van Dyke, president & founder, Javelin Strategy & Research. “With trust worsening and mobility increasing, large banks can dampen the exodus while moving closer to mobile payments with mobile remote deposit capture. Paper payments die slowly, and as RDC helps with electronification of checks for a death by a thousand cuts.'”
Because nearly three in four of business transactions are made via check, this product also has mass appeal to businesses, which – unlike consumers – could be likely to pay for this service, Javelin concludes.
Other key findings of the report:
• Mobile RDC can be an important element to stem customer attrition or attract new customers without costly infrastructure.
• Already, more than one in four consumers who have been victims of ID fraud has had their checking account number stolen. Financial institutions considering implementing mobile RDC must put tight security measures in place to prevent even more fraud.
• Financial institutions can cut costs by offering the eight in ten of consumers who walked in to a branch to make a deposit or withdraw cash in the last 90 days the alternative to use their phone to make a deposit.
• About one in five of smartphone owners use mobile banking on a daily basis – more than double the rate for consumers who do not own a smartphone.
• Many consumers are ready for RDC now, particularly selected high-income individuals
• Four out of ten tech-savvy consumers view mobile RDC technology as desirable.
“Mobile RDC captures unique attributes of mobile hardware and always-on connectivity, to expand mobile banking relationships. We forecast that by 2014, over half of the U.S. population with mobile phones will be using smartphones, a dramatic escalation from the current 18%. This will provide a solid base of growth for additional mobile RDC services,” said Javelin Strategy & Research Analyst Mark Schwanhausser.
What do you think?
One in four consumers and 39 percent of small businesses desire mobile remote deposit capture (mobile RDC), a technology that allows an image of a check to be deposited through a camera-equipped mobile phone. That's according to new research from Javelin Strategy & Research. A niche product in 2010, small banks and credit unions are the first to offer mobile RDC to identified trusted consumers as a way to retain customers and grow without reliance on branches.
Per the Mobile Remote Deposit Capture report, smartphones are a key factor in the adoption of Mobile RDC. Consumers need access to the mobile web and the ability to take a two-megapixel digital picture with their camera phone. “If one of the largest financial institutions in the U.S. – Bank of America, Chase, Citibank or Wells Fargo – offers mobile remote deposit capture, you will most likely see a domino effect of the other banks offering the service,” said James Van Dyke, president & founder, Javelin Strategy & Research. “With trust worsening and mobility increasing, large banks can dampen the exodus while moving closer to mobile payments with mobile remote deposit capture. Paper payments die slowly, and as RDC helps with electronification of checks for a death by a thousand cuts.'”
Because nearly three in four of business transactions are made via check, this product also has mass appeal to businesses, which – unlike consumers – could be likely to pay for this service, Javelin concludes.
Other key findings of the report:
• Mobile RDC can be an important element to stem customer attrition or attract new customers without costly infrastructure.
• Already, more than one in four consumers who have been victims of ID fraud has had their checking account number stolen. Financial institutions considering implementing mobile RDC must put tight security measures in place to prevent even more fraud.
• Financial institutions can cut costs by offering the eight in ten of consumers who walked in to a branch to make a deposit or withdraw cash in the last 90 days the alternative to use their phone to make a deposit.
• About one in five of smartphone owners use mobile banking on a daily basis – more than double the rate for consumers who do not own a smartphone.
• Many consumers are ready for RDC now, particularly selected high-income individuals
• Four out of ten tech-savvy consumers view mobile RDC technology as desirable.
“Mobile RDC captures unique attributes of mobile hardware and always-on connectivity, to expand mobile banking relationships. We forecast that by 2014, over half of the U.S. population with mobile phones will be using smartphones, a dramatic escalation from the current 18%. This will provide a solid base of growth for additional mobile RDC services,” said Javelin Strategy & Research Analyst Mark Schwanhausser.
What do you think?
Friday, February 19, 2010
The Image Clearing Opportunity
Posted by Mark Brousseau
Image clearing networks provide an opportunity for bankers banks to grow their revenues and attract new customers. US Dataworks President and COO Mario Villarreal (mvillarreal@usdataworks.com) explains:
At a time when paper cash letter volumes are rapidly declining, and the banking industry approaches the "last mile" in its migration toward electronic clearing, forward-thinking banks are leveraging Check 21 and their existing IT infrastructure to offer new image clearing services to community banks. If there is one thing that bankers have learned from the credit crisis, it is that focusing on their core services can provide a huge payoff.
Bankers banks provide valuable services to community banks, allowing them to compete with their larger counterparts. Bankers banks that have invested in the best technology to clear image exchange items also can offer this as a value-priced service to other bankers banks, extending their ability to service additional community banks, reduce costs, and expand their clearing network for improved funds availability and returns processing.
The Business Case
Prior to Check 21, check clearing was an extremely labor and capital-intensive process. For this reason, most bankers banks provided only settlement services: most community banks deposited paper cash letters at their nearby Federal Reserve Bank, while community banks that weren't members of the Federal Reserve settled their items through a bankers bank.
With the adoption of image clearing reaching more financial institutions, and advances in technology eliminating the need for bankers banks to print substitute checks in order to clear all of their items, more bankers banks are discovering that they can offer check clearing services to their customers with a much smaller investment in staff and equipment than in the past.
The goal for these bankers banks is to provide a lower-cost clearing option for their community bank customers or members, while generating non-interest income through clearing fees. By establishing a regional clearinghouse for in-network financial institutions, bankers banks can help their customers achieve lower costs through direct exchanges, as well as additional discounts through the bankers banks' aggregated volume. In most cases, community banks see savings of up to 20 percent compared to Federal Reserve Bank fees. Similarly, working with a bankers bank provides lower fees to receive image files from other banks. And bankers banks can offer value-added services such as item-level duplicate detection, which reduces errors and helps identify potential fraud. Other services include long-term payment archiving, expedited research and adjustments, and payment trend analysis.
In turn, bankers banks can strengthen their customer relationships, attract new bank customers, and increase the percentage of items cleared through their network. Bankers banks that have implemented this service have increased the rate of membership in the geographic region they serve, which results in a bigger network and more value to all participants.
Bankers banks also gain operational improvements by implementing an image exchange system that is not based on the old way of paper-check processing, but designed from the ground up to process today’s growing variety of payment types. In one case, a bankers bank reduced the time necessary to complete its check image processing from eight hours to less than 45 minutes using the new standard in image exchange processing. And, unlike traditional check systems, advanced image clearing solutions allow for configuration changes -- such as adding or disabling a clearing endpoint -- without a significant lead time or custom code.
Key Buying Criteria
When evaluating clearing solutions, there are four key criteria bankers banks should consider:
1. Scalability -- Image clearing requires the processing of large volumes in an extremely short processing window, as well as the effective management of a large number of image files.
2. Exceptions handling -- To minimize costly errors, an image clearing solution must have capabilities for duplicate detection.
3. Enhanced clearing capabilities -- In order to reduce fees, a clearing solution should have capabilities for in-network and consolidated decisioning, as well as bi-directional clearing.
4. Expandability -- Because of the fast-changing nature of the financial services industry, bankers banks should look for solutions that are designed to support future services.
Other evaluation criteria include startup and ongoing costs, time-to-market, the vendor's track record in high-volume operations, any value-added functionality (such as data analytics), and the level of control the bankers bank will have over product pricing, processing deadlines and service levels.
The Bottom Line
With fee income on the line, and community banks desperate for cost-effective clearing alternatives, more bankers banks will establish internal image clearing networks to harness the cost savings of in-network clearing and direct sends to major financial institutions, Returned items and research and adjustments are also simplified with the network approach. With these networks, bankers banks can provide the highest quality of correspondent services to community banks, as well as help their colleague bankers bank serve their customers. To provide even greater benefit to their customers, some of these bankers banks will create expanded same-day exchanges and exchanges with national and regional banks, and bundle their image clearing services with cash management products such as remote deposit capture (RDC) and automated clearing house (ACH) processing.
All of this will strengthen the role of bankers banks in the emerging financial services environment.
What do you think?
Image clearing networks provide an opportunity for bankers banks to grow their revenues and attract new customers. US Dataworks President and COO Mario Villarreal (mvillarreal@usdataworks.com) explains:
At a time when paper cash letter volumes are rapidly declining, and the banking industry approaches the "last mile" in its migration toward electronic clearing, forward-thinking banks are leveraging Check 21 and their existing IT infrastructure to offer new image clearing services to community banks. If there is one thing that bankers have learned from the credit crisis, it is that focusing on their core services can provide a huge payoff.
Bankers banks provide valuable services to community banks, allowing them to compete with their larger counterparts. Bankers banks that have invested in the best technology to clear image exchange items also can offer this as a value-priced service to other bankers banks, extending their ability to service additional community banks, reduce costs, and expand their clearing network for improved funds availability and returns processing.
The Business Case
Prior to Check 21, check clearing was an extremely labor and capital-intensive process. For this reason, most bankers banks provided only settlement services: most community banks deposited paper cash letters at their nearby Federal Reserve Bank, while community banks that weren't members of the Federal Reserve settled their items through a bankers bank.
With the adoption of image clearing reaching more financial institutions, and advances in technology eliminating the need for bankers banks to print substitute checks in order to clear all of their items, more bankers banks are discovering that they can offer check clearing services to their customers with a much smaller investment in staff and equipment than in the past.
The goal for these bankers banks is to provide a lower-cost clearing option for their community bank customers or members, while generating non-interest income through clearing fees. By establishing a regional clearinghouse for in-network financial institutions, bankers banks can help their customers achieve lower costs through direct exchanges, as well as additional discounts through the bankers banks' aggregated volume. In most cases, community banks see savings of up to 20 percent compared to Federal Reserve Bank fees. Similarly, working with a bankers bank provides lower fees to receive image files from other banks. And bankers banks can offer value-added services such as item-level duplicate detection, which reduces errors and helps identify potential fraud. Other services include long-term payment archiving, expedited research and adjustments, and payment trend analysis.
In turn, bankers banks can strengthen their customer relationships, attract new bank customers, and increase the percentage of items cleared through their network. Bankers banks that have implemented this service have increased the rate of membership in the geographic region they serve, which results in a bigger network and more value to all participants.
Bankers banks also gain operational improvements by implementing an image exchange system that is not based on the old way of paper-check processing, but designed from the ground up to process today’s growing variety of payment types. In one case, a bankers bank reduced the time necessary to complete its check image processing from eight hours to less than 45 minutes using the new standard in image exchange processing. And, unlike traditional check systems, advanced image clearing solutions allow for configuration changes -- such as adding or disabling a clearing endpoint -- without a significant lead time or custom code.
Key Buying Criteria
When evaluating clearing solutions, there are four key criteria bankers banks should consider:
1. Scalability -- Image clearing requires the processing of large volumes in an extremely short processing window, as well as the effective management of a large number of image files.
2. Exceptions handling -- To minimize costly errors, an image clearing solution must have capabilities for duplicate detection.
3. Enhanced clearing capabilities -- In order to reduce fees, a clearing solution should have capabilities for in-network and consolidated decisioning, as well as bi-directional clearing.
4. Expandability -- Because of the fast-changing nature of the financial services industry, bankers banks should look for solutions that are designed to support future services.
Other evaluation criteria include startup and ongoing costs, time-to-market, the vendor's track record in high-volume operations, any value-added functionality (such as data analytics), and the level of control the bankers bank will have over product pricing, processing deadlines and service levels.
The Bottom Line
With fee income on the line, and community banks desperate for cost-effective clearing alternatives, more bankers banks will establish internal image clearing networks to harness the cost savings of in-network clearing and direct sends to major financial institutions, Returned items and research and adjustments are also simplified with the network approach. With these networks, bankers banks can provide the highest quality of correspondent services to community banks, as well as help their colleague bankers bank serve their customers. To provide even greater benefit to their customers, some of these bankers banks will create expanded same-day exchanges and exchanges with national and regional banks, and bundle their image clearing services with cash management products such as remote deposit capture (RDC) and automated clearing house (ACH) processing.
All of this will strengthen the role of bankers banks in the emerging financial services environment.
What do you think?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
