By Mark Brousseau
While the Federal Reserve Bank’s latest figures show that electronic payments continue to achieve strong growth, the data also suggests we’re still a long way off from the eagerly-anticipated “checkless” society.
With 28.8 billion checks written in 2010 -- the last year the Federal Reserve researched -- the number of checks written between 2007 and 2010 declined by about 6 percent per year. What’s more, 92 percent of checks are now cleared electronically between U.S. banks, according to the Federal Reserve’s research.
So what should remittance processors make of this data?
“It’s clear that U.S. check volumes continue to decline at a gradual rate,” says Creditron Founder and CEO Wally Vogel, “But checks are not likely to disappear any time soon.” While those might be sobering words from some paper-weary operations managers, they can take heart in the fact that paper deposits – a drag on costs and efficiency – are experiencing a rapid decline as Check 21 emerges as the method of choice for deposits (Vogel points to NACHA figures showing a big drop in Accounts Receivable Check Conversion volumes). “This is bad news for manufacturers of high-volume check encoding equipment, but it’s a great opportunity for providers of Check 21 remote deposit technology. There are many remittance shops that manually process their transactions, or have outdated solutions that don’t support Check 21. With banks continuing to lower their fees for Check 21 deposits, many of these shops will likely look for electronic solutions.”
Vogel notes that Creditron has recently seen strong demand for its Check 21 remote deposit capabilities. “The market is recognizing the value of remittance solutions that offer Check 21 remote deposit, as well as an image-based workflow. Against this backdrop, I think we are well-positioned for success and growth.”
What do you think?
Showing posts with label Creditron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Creditron. Show all posts
Wednesday, April 6, 2011
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Municipalities eager to automate RP
Posted by Mark Brousseau
Municipal governments are showing strong interest in purchasing automated remittance solutions, and it appears that the sluggish economy -- and its impact on municipal budgets -- is the primary reason, according to Tony Rapaglia, regional manager for Creditron (trapaglia@creditron.com). Municipalities are looking to automate functions such as tax and utility payment processing, Rapaglia explains, adding that he expects the strong demand to carry over into the new year.
"Especially after the recent elections, municipalities are extremely conscious about the amount of money they are spending on back-office functions such as remittance processing," Rapaglia says. "Many are focused like a laser-bean on cutting costs and improving service to taxpayers. They recognize that they can pass along any savings from more efficient processing to their taxpayers."
So why is remittance processing, in particular, getting so much attention from municipalities?
For starters, Rapaglia notes that automated remittance processing frees up municipal workers to focus on other activities -- which is critical as they look to become more taxpayer-focused and make do with less staff. Automated remittance processing also helps municipalities make deposits much quicker, delivering immediate gains in funds availability. Even greater gains are on tap for those municipalities that deposit items electronically to their banks via Check 21. And municipalities are drawn to the improved security that an automated remittance system provides compared to paper processes. "In an automated environment, less people handle the checks, and there's less opportunity to lose them," Rapaglia explains, noting a recent case where a courier misplaced paper checks.
"Municipal budgets are certainly tight, but more of them are recognizing that they can achieve big savings by spending relatively little money on an automated remittance system," Rapaglia concludes.
Municipal governments are showing strong interest in purchasing automated remittance solutions, and it appears that the sluggish economy -- and its impact on municipal budgets -- is the primary reason, according to Tony Rapaglia, regional manager for Creditron (trapaglia@creditron.com). Municipalities are looking to automate functions such as tax and utility payment processing, Rapaglia explains, adding that he expects the strong demand to carry over into the new year.
"Especially after the recent elections, municipalities are extremely conscious about the amount of money they are spending on back-office functions such as remittance processing," Rapaglia says. "Many are focused like a laser-bean on cutting costs and improving service to taxpayers. They recognize that they can pass along any savings from more efficient processing to their taxpayers."
So why is remittance processing, in particular, getting so much attention from municipalities?
For starters, Rapaglia notes that automated remittance processing frees up municipal workers to focus on other activities -- which is critical as they look to become more taxpayer-focused and make do with less staff. Automated remittance processing also helps municipalities make deposits much quicker, delivering immediate gains in funds availability. Even greater gains are on tap for those municipalities that deposit items electronically to their banks via Check 21. And municipalities are drawn to the improved security that an automated remittance system provides compared to paper processes. "In an automated environment, less people handle the checks, and there's less opportunity to lose them," Rapaglia explains, noting a recent case where a courier misplaced paper checks.
"Municipal budgets are certainly tight, but more of them are recognizing that they can achieve big savings by spending relatively little money on an automated remittance system," Rapaglia concludes.
Monday, August 30, 2010
6 Questions to Ask When Shopping for a Remittance Solution
By Mark Brousseau
Buying a remittance processing solution has never been easy. But the combination of emerging payment and clearing channels, expanding systems integration requirements, and new customer service demands has made the process more confusing than ever.
To add some clarity, Wally Vogel (wvogel@creditron.com), founder and CEO of Creditron, Inc. (www.creditron) offers the following six questions to ask a prospective remittance solutions vendors.
1. How much opening and pre-sorting is required before scanning incoming remittance work?
Bearing in mind that there are often several steps required to move from unopened mail to stacks of clean sorted documents, which some remittance solutions require, Vogel suggests looking at the remittance solution in the context of the end-to-end operation. "Look for a vendor that can integrate with an efficient mail opening system and handle a variety of transaction type without requiring pre-sorting," Vogel advises.
2. What about payments that are made in person or over the web?
The mix of payments has changed and will continue to change, and spending money on a solution that only handles mail payments no longer makes sense, Vogel says. "A remittance platform worth investing in should have fully integrated cashiering, web payments, and credit card payments, with consolidated deposits, accounting updates, and reports," Vogel says.
3. Have you successfully interfaced with our ERP/accounting system/billing system/content management software before?
This is an area of potential hidden costs and problems if not addressed upfront, Vogel warns. "You have a significant investment in your information systems, and front end capture points such as remittance processing need to work seamlessly or the result will be unexpected integration work by your IS group, or worse, unforeseen problems with your data down the road," Vogel says.
4. Have you successfully implemented Check 21 Image Cash Letter with our bank before?
This is another potential problem if your remittance vendor and bank are not on the same page, Vogel says. "Don’t get caught in between. Use a vendor that has already proven that they can work with your bank, or if your bank does not have a process and certification in place for working with third party vendors consider using another bank for image cash letter services and having the funds swept to your main bank on a daily basis," Vogel recommends.
5. Is this a fully proven and tested solution or will there be any customized code?
Unless you want to be a beta tester, you should choose a vendor that has completely standardized and proven code that can be configured to your needs through parameters. "Even a small block of customized code can cause problems with reliability or integrity, and make later updates problematic and expensive," Vogel explains. "Choose a vendor with a standard codebase and an easy method to upgrade to the latest revision."
6. Are you a Microsoft Certified partner?
"If you are putting wiring in your house, you insist on a licensed electrician. If you want legal advice, you look for a lawyer that has passed the bar. Similarly, if you are choosing a remittance software provider to work in the Microsoft Windows environment, you should insist in a Microsoft Certified Partner," Vogel says. "This ensures that you are dealing with a professional and qualified organization which has made the investment in certifying their people and products before asking you to make an investment in their solutions."
Do you have any tips you can share?
Buying a remittance processing solution has never been easy. But the combination of emerging payment and clearing channels, expanding systems integration requirements, and new customer service demands has made the process more confusing than ever.
To add some clarity, Wally Vogel (wvogel@creditron.com), founder and CEO of Creditron, Inc. (www.creditron) offers the following six questions to ask a prospective remittance solutions vendors.
1. How much opening and pre-sorting is required before scanning incoming remittance work?
Bearing in mind that there are often several steps required to move from unopened mail to stacks of clean sorted documents, which some remittance solutions require, Vogel suggests looking at the remittance solution in the context of the end-to-end operation. "Look for a vendor that can integrate with an efficient mail opening system and handle a variety of transaction type without requiring pre-sorting," Vogel advises.
2. What about payments that are made in person or over the web?
The mix of payments has changed and will continue to change, and spending money on a solution that only handles mail payments no longer makes sense, Vogel says. "A remittance platform worth investing in should have fully integrated cashiering, web payments, and credit card payments, with consolidated deposits, accounting updates, and reports," Vogel says.
3. Have you successfully interfaced with our ERP/accounting system/billing system/content management software before?
This is an area of potential hidden costs and problems if not addressed upfront, Vogel warns. "You have a significant investment in your information systems, and front end capture points such as remittance processing need to work seamlessly or the result will be unexpected integration work by your IS group, or worse, unforeseen problems with your data down the road," Vogel says.
4. Have you successfully implemented Check 21 Image Cash Letter with our bank before?
This is another potential problem if your remittance vendor and bank are not on the same page, Vogel says. "Don’t get caught in between. Use a vendor that has already proven that they can work with your bank, or if your bank does not have a process and certification in place for working with third party vendors consider using another bank for image cash letter services and having the funds swept to your main bank on a daily basis," Vogel recommends.
5. Is this a fully proven and tested solution or will there be any customized code?
Unless you want to be a beta tester, you should choose a vendor that has completely standardized and proven code that can be configured to your needs through parameters. "Even a small block of customized code can cause problems with reliability or integrity, and make later updates problematic and expensive," Vogel explains. "Choose a vendor with a standard codebase and an easy method to upgrade to the latest revision."
6. Are you a Microsoft Certified partner?
"If you are putting wiring in your house, you insist on a licensed electrician. If you want legal advice, you look for a lawyer that has passed the bar. Similarly, if you are choosing a remittance software provider to work in the Microsoft Windows environment, you should insist in a Microsoft Certified Partner," Vogel says. "This ensures that you are dealing with a professional and qualified organization which has made the investment in certifying their people and products before asking you to make an investment in their solutions."
Do you have any tips you can share?
Friday, July 30, 2010
The evolution of remote capture
By Wally Vogel (www.wvogel@creditron.com)
When remote deposit capture (RDC) first burst onto the scene, it was billed as a way for companies to eliminate daily trips to the bank. Today, reducing the time and costs associated with depositing checks is still a key factor in the adoption of the technology. But application of the technology has also evolved into a compliment to remittance processing, such as a way for far-flung sales agents to capture check images more quickly – helping to drive faster funds availability and enhanced service.
RDC is a product of The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (“Check 21”), a federal law enacted in 2004 that allows billers to electronically capture and transmit (via X9.37 file format) images of checks to their financial institution for clearing. Integrated balancing and automated character recognition tools assist billers in building balanced deposits. Once deposits are transmitted, original checks are truncated (retained) and eventually destroyed. Upon receipt of the file, the bank validates the items, performs any necessary corrections, and creates an image cash letter (or ICL) for deposit.
A Compliment to Remittance Processing
It didn’t take long for billers to recognize that RDC could be used to compliment -- and streamline -- remittance processing, which has historically been a back-office task. By capturing payment images and data at the point of presentment, and integrating the images and data with the back-office payments stream -- rather than redirecting the payments to the back-office -- billers can accelerate processing and funds availability; eliminate the costs to ship or transport payments to the back-office; offload some of the work from their back-office staff (and maybe even offload the work from their staff altogether); free back-office staff to perform other functions; and reduce paper handling and the associated costs. What’s more, capturing payments information sooner provides benefits such as faster posting, better visibility into receivables, and faster responses to customer inquiries.
The best part: remote deposit capture accomplishes all of this without requiring much upfront cost.
New RDC technologies are further expanding the applicability of the technology as a compliment to back-office remittance processing. For instance, support for flatbed TWAIN scanners enables consumers or remote employees to capture payments without the requirement for a specialized check scanner. Recognizing that the user in this environment may not be trained in payment processing, software guides the user through the scanning process. Another advancement in RDC is the use of smartphones to capture payment images. This enables field agents to capture payment images without having to transport or ship them to the back-office for processing – greatly speeding posting.
The Bottom Line
By complimenting back-office remittance processing with RDC, funds are available sooner, overall costs are improved, and customer service is enhanced. And because of the low overhead associated with RDC, growth in the biller’s remittance volume can be accommodated without a corresponding growth in the biller’s back-office infrastructure – meaning they can avoid a lot of capital expense.
When remote deposit capture (RDC) first burst onto the scene, it was billed as a way for companies to eliminate daily trips to the bank. Today, reducing the time and costs associated with depositing checks is still a key factor in the adoption of the technology. But application of the technology has also evolved into a compliment to remittance processing, such as a way for far-flung sales agents to capture check images more quickly – helping to drive faster funds availability and enhanced service.
RDC is a product of The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (“Check 21”), a federal law enacted in 2004 that allows billers to electronically capture and transmit (via X9.37 file format) images of checks to their financial institution for clearing. Integrated balancing and automated character recognition tools assist billers in building balanced deposits. Once deposits are transmitted, original checks are truncated (retained) and eventually destroyed. Upon receipt of the file, the bank validates the items, performs any necessary corrections, and creates an image cash letter (or ICL) for deposit.
A Compliment to Remittance Processing
It didn’t take long for billers to recognize that RDC could be used to compliment -- and streamline -- remittance processing, which has historically been a back-office task. By capturing payment images and data at the point of presentment, and integrating the images and data with the back-office payments stream -- rather than redirecting the payments to the back-office -- billers can accelerate processing and funds availability; eliminate the costs to ship or transport payments to the back-office; offload some of the work from their back-office staff (and maybe even offload the work from their staff altogether); free back-office staff to perform other functions; and reduce paper handling and the associated costs. What’s more, capturing payments information sooner provides benefits such as faster posting, better visibility into receivables, and faster responses to customer inquiries.
The best part: remote deposit capture accomplishes all of this without requiring much upfront cost.
New RDC technologies are further expanding the applicability of the technology as a compliment to back-office remittance processing. For instance, support for flatbed TWAIN scanners enables consumers or remote employees to capture payments without the requirement for a specialized check scanner. Recognizing that the user in this environment may not be trained in payment processing, software guides the user through the scanning process. Another advancement in RDC is the use of smartphones to capture payment images. This enables field agents to capture payment images without having to transport or ship them to the back-office for processing – greatly speeding posting.
The Bottom Line
By complimenting back-office remittance processing with RDC, funds are available sooner, overall costs are improved, and customer service is enhanced. And because of the low overhead associated with RDC, growth in the biller’s remittance volume can be accommodated without a corresponding growth in the biller’s back-office infrastructure – meaning they can avoid a lot of capital expense.
Tuesday, June 1, 2010
Sputtering Check Conversion
By Mark Brousseau
While the latest statistics from Herndon, VA-based NACHA show that overall Automated Clearing House (ACH) volumes increased slightly in 2009 (2.6 percent compared to 2008 activity), Accounts Receivable Check (ARC) Conversion -- once the darling of remittance operations -- decreased by more than 10 percent during the same period. In 2009, there were approximately 2.4 billion ARC transactions, NACHA reports, compared to nearly 2.7 billion ARC transactions the previous year.
The drop in ARC volumes comes as no surprise to Creditron, Inc., Founder and CEO Wally Vogel (wvogel@creditron.com). Vogel expects ARC volumes to continue to fall as consumers move away from writing checks for recurring remittances and towards electronic mechanisms such as Internet-initiated payments (which registered a stout 9.7 percent volume increase in 2009, NACHA reports).
Vogel says that, "As far as we have seen, ARC is not really going anywhere among mid-volume processors. Our clients are either moving to Check 21 or staying with what they have. Many clients don't perceive a significant cost benefit if they already have an automated encoding solution."
Vogel adds that Creditron is seeing "slow but steady growth in Check 21 among its current clients, and virtually all of its new installations include Check 21. The biggest reason our clients are reluctant to implement ARC is the notification requirement, which isn't a factor if they go with Check 21."
What are you seeing?
While the latest statistics from Herndon, VA-based NACHA show that overall Automated Clearing House (ACH) volumes increased slightly in 2009 (2.6 percent compared to 2008 activity), Accounts Receivable Check (ARC) Conversion -- once the darling of remittance operations -- decreased by more than 10 percent during the same period. In 2009, there were approximately 2.4 billion ARC transactions, NACHA reports, compared to nearly 2.7 billion ARC transactions the previous year.
The drop in ARC volumes comes as no surprise to Creditron, Inc., Founder and CEO Wally Vogel (wvogel@creditron.com). Vogel expects ARC volumes to continue to fall as consumers move away from writing checks for recurring remittances and towards electronic mechanisms such as Internet-initiated payments (which registered a stout 9.7 percent volume increase in 2009, NACHA reports).
Vogel says that, "As far as we have seen, ARC is not really going anywhere among mid-volume processors. Our clients are either moving to Check 21 or staying with what they have. Many clients don't perceive a significant cost benefit if they already have an automated encoding solution."
Vogel adds that Creditron is seeing "slow but steady growth in Check 21 among its current clients, and virtually all of its new installations include Check 21. The biggest reason our clients are reluctant to implement ARC is the notification requirement, which isn't a factor if they go with Check 21."
What are you seeing?
Tuesday, April 13, 2010
Maximizing RDC Payback
Posted by Mark Brousseau
Not getting the labor savings you expected from your bank's remote deposit capture solution? Wally Vogel, founder and CEO of Creditron, Inc. (wvogel@creditron.com) is not surprised.
"In instances where checks come in and are posted to accounts receivable, scanning the checks for the bank saves a trip to the bank, but does nothing to aid in reducing data entry, balancing, or exception handling," Vogel explains. "These are the time-consuming parts of posting and depositing payments, and they are not addressed by a remote deposit scanner from the bank."
Vogel adds, "What will save significant time is a complete remittance processing solution which can: scan remittance documents and checks, automatically recognize data to reduce key entry, balance the transaction, and perform look-ups and validity checks to handle exceptions quickly. Of course, a complete remittance processing solution also can update the accounts receivable system and deposit items remotely as well, without requiring the user to re-scan or re-key the checks."
The bottom line: the trick to saving time with remote deposit capture is to handle both sides of the transaction with a single automated solution, Vogel says.
What do you think?
Not getting the labor savings you expected from your bank's remote deposit capture solution? Wally Vogel, founder and CEO of Creditron, Inc. (wvogel@creditron.com) is not surprised.
"In instances where checks come in and are posted to accounts receivable, scanning the checks for the bank saves a trip to the bank, but does nothing to aid in reducing data entry, balancing, or exception handling," Vogel explains. "These are the time-consuming parts of posting and depositing payments, and they are not addressed by a remote deposit scanner from the bank."
Vogel adds, "What will save significant time is a complete remittance processing solution which can: scan remittance documents and checks, automatically recognize data to reduce key entry, balance the transaction, and perform look-ups and validity checks to handle exceptions quickly. Of course, a complete remittance processing solution also can update the accounts receivable system and deposit items remotely as well, without requiring the user to re-scan or re-key the checks."
The bottom line: the trick to saving time with remote deposit capture is to handle both sides of the transaction with a single automated solution, Vogel says.
What do you think?
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
Not All Municipalities Outsourcing
By Mark Brousseau
While payments processing outsourcing has gained traction among government entities during the economic downturn, it's still not for everyone. A case in point: the Apache County Tax Collector (Arizona), which recently implemented a solution to automate the processing of its tax payments.
"We never really considered outsourcing," explains Apache County Tax Collector Chief Deputy Sandy Klinchock. She believes that in-house processing provides more control and better quality.
Known as the longest county in the country, Apache County runs 211 miles from the Utah border to just south of Alpine, Arizona. Two-thirds of the population, and over one-half of the land area, belongs to the Navajo Nation, the largest Native American tribe. Currently comprised of 70,000 residents, Apache County is growing : new subdivisions have been approved, permanent jobs are being created, and the county is investing in the services required for an expanding population.
With the Apache County Tax Collector committed to keeping its payments processing in-house, it knew it needed a solution for automating its tax processing. Previously, three employees processed the county's roughly 68,000 tax payments in about a three-week window. By automating, the county also hoped to streamline its deposits to improve funds availability and working capital management.
"We wanted to become more efficient, while enhancing our service to constituents," Klinchock says.
In late 2009, the Apache County Tax Collector implemented an image-enabled remittance processing solution from Creditron. The system includes a 3000t check scanner from NCR, courtesy and legal amount recognition (CAR/LAR), and the ability to deposit funds electronically via Check 21.
The Apache County Tax Collector selected Creditron based on its implementation of a system at nearby Navajo County, and on its willingness to meet the county's fast installation schedule; the Apache County Tax Collector went into production a few weeks after signing its Creditron contract. Navajo County handles back-end tax accounting on behalf of the Apache County Tax Collector.
As a result of automating its tax processing, and depositing funds electronically, Apache County Tax Collector now gets all of its funds to the bank the same day they are processed. In its old manual environment, it took the county two to three days to turn around its deposits. "Now, we can keep our money invested for a longer period of time," Klinchock says. "We also have a clearer picture of how much money we have in the bank, and whether we have to pull from investments to pay warrants."
The county also is able to make electronic deposits for all eight of its departments. And depositing funds electronically eliminated daily courier runs to the bank, which cost the county $350 a month. Additionally, there are fewer calls from customers asking why their check hasn't cleared sooner.
With results like these, Klinchock is surprised that so many government entities are outsourcing their payments processing. "If they take some of these arguments to their board, I think they will find a receptive audience," she says. "When our board heard about the benefits, they were all for it."
Creditron Founder and CEO Wally Vogel adds that the experience of the Apache County Tax Collector shows that government entities don't have to outsource to reduce costs or gain efficiencies.
While payments processing outsourcing has gained traction among government entities during the economic downturn, it's still not for everyone. A case in point: the Apache County Tax Collector (Arizona), which recently implemented a solution to automate the processing of its tax payments.
"We never really considered outsourcing," explains Apache County Tax Collector Chief Deputy Sandy Klinchock. She believes that in-house processing provides more control and better quality.
Known as the longest county in the country, Apache County runs 211 miles from the Utah border to just south of Alpine, Arizona. Two-thirds of the population, and over one-half of the land area, belongs to the Navajo Nation, the largest Native American tribe. Currently comprised of 70,000 residents, Apache County is growing : new subdivisions have been approved, permanent jobs are being created, and the county is investing in the services required for an expanding population.
With the Apache County Tax Collector committed to keeping its payments processing in-house, it knew it needed a solution for automating its tax processing. Previously, three employees processed the county's roughly 68,000 tax payments in about a three-week window. By automating, the county also hoped to streamline its deposits to improve funds availability and working capital management.
"We wanted to become more efficient, while enhancing our service to constituents," Klinchock says.
In late 2009, the Apache County Tax Collector implemented an image-enabled remittance processing solution from Creditron. The system includes a 3000t check scanner from NCR, courtesy and legal amount recognition (CAR/LAR), and the ability to deposit funds electronically via Check 21.
The Apache County Tax Collector selected Creditron based on its implementation of a system at nearby Navajo County, and on its willingness to meet the county's fast installation schedule; the Apache County Tax Collector went into production a few weeks after signing its Creditron contract. Navajo County handles back-end tax accounting on behalf of the Apache County Tax Collector.
As a result of automating its tax processing, and depositing funds electronically, Apache County Tax Collector now gets all of its funds to the bank the same day they are processed. In its old manual environment, it took the county two to three days to turn around its deposits. "Now, we can keep our money invested for a longer period of time," Klinchock says. "We also have a clearer picture of how much money we have in the bank, and whether we have to pull from investments to pay warrants."
The county also is able to make electronic deposits for all eight of its departments. And depositing funds electronically eliminated daily courier runs to the bank, which cost the county $350 a month. Additionally, there are fewer calls from customers asking why their check hasn't cleared sooner.
With results like these, Klinchock is surprised that so many government entities are outsourcing their payments processing. "If they take some of these arguments to their board, I think they will find a receptive audience," she says. "When our board heard about the benefits, they were all for it."
Creditron Founder and CEO Wally Vogel adds that the experience of the Apache County Tax Collector shows that government entities don't have to outsource to reduce costs or gain efficiencies.
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
New PCI Compliance Challenge
Posted by Mark Brousseau
Remittance operations face even greater challenges from new PCI compliance guidelines. Doug Myers, vice president of sales and business development for Creditron, explains:
A flurry of new regulations, guidelines and clarifications designed to improve credit card security has remittance operations that handle credit card payments -- in the back-office or via walk-up locations -- scrambling. With three new pieces of guidance on the docket for Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance, and larger fines for non-compliance, these operations face external pressures to beat the deadlines, as well as internal pressures to meet requirements in a strategic and cost-effective manner.
PCI and RP
The PCI Standard is the result of a collaborative effort formed by the five major credit card companies (Visa International, MasterCard Worldwide, American Express, Discover Financial Services and JCB) to develop an efficient approach to safeguarding sensitive data and for the prevention of credit card fraud, hacking and various other security concerns. Any merchant, organization or software that processes, stores or disseminates credit card data must be PCI DSS compliant or they risk hefty fines and/or losing the ability to process credit cards altogether.
Remittance processors that accept credit card payments in lieu of checks must meet the standard.
Failure to comply with PCI standards exposes an organization to two types of liability: substantial penalties, and, more importantly, "charge-back" liability for damages suffered by the card issuer as a result of a data breach. The losses sustained by card issuers includes not only the fraudulent charges made on the accounts of the victims of identity theft, but also the administrative costs associated with the issuance of new cards to customers whose personal information may have been compromised. As a result, these costs can be significant. Add in the damage to reputation associated with the loss of customer card details, and the importance of PCI compliance to remittance processors becomes clear.
Conversely, in an environment where consumers are concerned about privacy and online security, there is an opportunity for businesses to improve their security posture by meeting the PCI standard.
What You Should Do
Remittance operations put their organizations at great risk if due diligence is not practiced and steps are not taken to protect cardholder and member data. Managers must take a very active approach to operational risk management, and not assume that the PCI DSS standard doesn't apply to them.
One strategy to ensure PCI compliance for remittance operations is to work with vendors that have already deployed a PCI compliance program for their entire end-to-end suite. With this approach, the onus is on the vendor to ensure that their underlying software and processes gain and maintain PCI compliance. This won't let operations off the hook for PCI, but it is a lower cost route to compliance.
To see if your vendor has a validated PCI application, visit www.pcisecuritystandards.org.
Remittance operations face even greater challenges from new PCI compliance guidelines. Doug Myers, vice president of sales and business development for Creditron, explains:
A flurry of new regulations, guidelines and clarifications designed to improve credit card security has remittance operations that handle credit card payments -- in the back-office or via walk-up locations -- scrambling. With three new pieces of guidance on the docket for Payment Card Industry (PCI) compliance, and larger fines for non-compliance, these operations face external pressures to beat the deadlines, as well as internal pressures to meet requirements in a strategic and cost-effective manner.
PCI and RP
The PCI Standard is the result of a collaborative effort formed by the five major credit card companies (Visa International, MasterCard Worldwide, American Express, Discover Financial Services and JCB) to develop an efficient approach to safeguarding sensitive data and for the prevention of credit card fraud, hacking and various other security concerns. Any merchant, organization or software that processes, stores or disseminates credit card data must be PCI DSS compliant or they risk hefty fines and/or losing the ability to process credit cards altogether.
Remittance processors that accept credit card payments in lieu of checks must meet the standard.
Failure to comply with PCI standards exposes an organization to two types of liability: substantial penalties, and, more importantly, "charge-back" liability for damages suffered by the card issuer as a result of a data breach. The losses sustained by card issuers includes not only the fraudulent charges made on the accounts of the victims of identity theft, but also the administrative costs associated with the issuance of new cards to customers whose personal information may have been compromised. As a result, these costs can be significant. Add in the damage to reputation associated with the loss of customer card details, and the importance of PCI compliance to remittance processors becomes clear.
Conversely, in an environment where consumers are concerned about privacy and online security, there is an opportunity for businesses to improve their security posture by meeting the PCI standard.
What You Should Do
Remittance operations put their organizations at great risk if due diligence is not practiced and steps are not taken to protect cardholder and member data. Managers must take a very active approach to operational risk management, and not assume that the PCI DSS standard doesn't apply to them.
One strategy to ensure PCI compliance for remittance operations is to work with vendors that have already deployed a PCI compliance program for their entire end-to-end suite. With this approach, the onus is on the vendor to ensure that their underlying software and processes gain and maintain PCI compliance. This won't let operations off the hook for PCI, but it is a lower cost route to compliance.
To see if your vendor has a validated PCI application, visit www.pcisecuritystandards.org.
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
You Get What You Pay For -- Even With Remittance Solutions
By Mark Brousseau
When making a purchase, everyone like to "get the best deal." In these difficult economic times, with costs being carefully scrutinized, that is more true then ever.
So, when it comes to remittance solutions, what is the best deal, and what is the true cost?
"A neighbor and I replaced our roof shingles at about the same time last summer," recalls Wally Vogel, president of Purepay Receivables Automation (wvogel@pure-pay.com). "My neighbor proudly told me that he paid half the price to his roofer for the same job. 'The roofers are all the same,' he said. Right? When I heard this I felt that maybe I should have obtained more quotes (I did get two), or shopped around more. But this spring when my neighbor had water leaking into his house in three places, and was unable to track down the company that did his roof, I felt sorry for him. But I also felt better about the value I received for my money. The lowest price does not always represent the best value."
What's true for roofers is also true for remittance processing solution providers, Vogel cautions. "They are not all the same, and choosing the wrong one can be an expensive error," he says. "Saving some money upfront won't seem like such a good idea when your system is down, or you have errors and inefficiencies keeping your organization from making your deposit deadlines."
Vogel says users need to ensure that they are getting a solution that will truly meet their needs, before they consider the price. "Missing features could result in extra manual keying and sorting, which will reduce the time savings of the solution," Vogel explains. "A poor user interface could result in operator errors which are expensive to correct and can cause customer service issues. And a cheaper scanner could jam more, have poor image quality and a lower read rate, resulting in less throughput and more errors."
There are other hidden costs as well. Some of these may be obvious, such as higher costs for maintenance, Vogel says. Others may not come to light for a year or two, when it's time to change a step in the process. "This is when users discover that they need to pay more for custom changes that wouldn't be necessary with a more flexible remittance solution," he says.
When making a purchase, everyone like to "get the best deal." In these difficult economic times, with costs being carefully scrutinized, that is more true then ever.
So, when it comes to remittance solutions, what is the best deal, and what is the true cost?
"A neighbor and I replaced our roof shingles at about the same time last summer," recalls Wally Vogel, president of Purepay Receivables Automation (wvogel@pure-pay.com). "My neighbor proudly told me that he paid half the price to his roofer for the same job. 'The roofers are all the same,' he said. Right? When I heard this I felt that maybe I should have obtained more quotes (I did get two), or shopped around more. But this spring when my neighbor had water leaking into his house in three places, and was unable to track down the company that did his roof, I felt sorry for him. But I also felt better about the value I received for my money. The lowest price does not always represent the best value."
What's true for roofers is also true for remittance processing solution providers, Vogel cautions. "They are not all the same, and choosing the wrong one can be an expensive error," he says. "Saving some money upfront won't seem like such a good idea when your system is down, or you have errors and inefficiencies keeping your organization from making your deposit deadlines."
Vogel says users need to ensure that they are getting a solution that will truly meet their needs, before they consider the price. "Missing features could result in extra manual keying and sorting, which will reduce the time savings of the solution," Vogel explains. "A poor user interface could result in operator errors which are expensive to correct and can cause customer service issues. And a cheaper scanner could jam more, have poor image quality and a lower read rate, resulting in less throughput and more errors."
There are other hidden costs as well. Some of these may be obvious, such as higher costs for maintenance, Vogel says. Others may not come to light for a year or two, when it's time to change a step in the process. "This is when users discover that they need to pay more for custom changes that wouldn't be necessary with a more flexible remittance solution," he says.
Another hidden cost is the time and effort required by a biller's staff, and its IT department, to implement the solution. "Purchasing a less expensive system which takes twice as long to implement, or purchasing from a company which does not have efficient project management in coordinating the interfaces, testing, and training required will result in internal costs that could well exceed the savings when compared to a truly turnkey solution from an organization with a professional implementation and delivery model," Vogel says.
So, when seeking the best value in a remittance solution, Vogel recommends that billers look beyond the sticker price and consider:
... a full set of time saving features (e.g. no need to sort multis from singles, MICR match for check only, account number reading for consolidator checks, ICR roping of long lists)
... ease of use and user interface (e.g. one key zoom, color coding, easy to read fonts)
... quality of the scanner hardware
... maintenance costs
... costs for future changes and upgrades
... time to complete implementation
... quality of project management from vendor
... expectation of your IT involvement
"Taking these and other factors into consideration will help ensure that you truly obtain the best value and that you will be satisfied with your remittance solution in the long run," Vogel says. "Checking references, talking to others about their experience with the vendor, and visiting other client sites is a great way to assess what you can expect from a vendor and what type of value they will deliver over the long term."
"I have heard some say that remittance solutions are commodity items and that they just want the lowest price," Vogel concludes. "If anyone still believes that, I say let's talk. We can meet at my neighbor's house. But you might have to bring a bucket if it's a rainy day."
Monday, March 31, 2008
Why The Fuss Over Remote Capture?
By Mark Brousseau
Many people believe that the future of electronic payment processing includes a growing trend toward including accounts receivable, check and deposit capture at the point of presentment. So what are the benefits of this strategy? And what about its challenges?
“The strategy of moving image capture to the point of presentment provides numerous advantages,” Wally Vogel (wally_vogel@creditron.com), president of Creditron, Inc., told me. “Obviously, there is the reduction of payment document handling and forwarding, and the associated lag time. This improves cash control and offers faster funds availability.”
“Beyond that, image capture at the point of presentment allows for greater control and audit capabilities,” Vogel added. “As soon as the document is scanned, it is captured and logged, and can be tracked through various processes for depositing, accounts receivable updates, and handling change of address requests and customer service inquiries, among other functions.”
With the proper systems in place, Vogel added, document images can be viewed from any authorized inquiry station on the network for customer purposes, within minutes of receiving the document. This means that data completion from image can be completed in a remote office or in a centralized location, providing greater flexibility while maintaining strict control and a complete audit trail for each transaction, wherever it is processed.
“One of the significant challenges of image capture at the point of presentment is the need to standardize rules, processes and practices across remote offices. Otherwise, users may not get the full advantage of remote capture,” Vogel said. “This may require a thorough business analysis and a willingness to unify business processes.”
What do you think? E-mail me at m_brousseau@msn.com.
Many people believe that the future of electronic payment processing includes a growing trend toward including accounts receivable, check and deposit capture at the point of presentment. So what are the benefits of this strategy? And what about its challenges?
“The strategy of moving image capture to the point of presentment provides numerous advantages,” Wally Vogel (wally_vogel@creditron.com), president of Creditron, Inc., told me. “Obviously, there is the reduction of payment document handling and forwarding, and the associated lag time. This improves cash control and offers faster funds availability.”
“Beyond that, image capture at the point of presentment allows for greater control and audit capabilities,” Vogel added. “As soon as the document is scanned, it is captured and logged, and can be tracked through various processes for depositing, accounts receivable updates, and handling change of address requests and customer service inquiries, among other functions.”
With the proper systems in place, Vogel added, document images can be viewed from any authorized inquiry station on the network for customer purposes, within minutes of receiving the document. This means that data completion from image can be completed in a remote office or in a centralized location, providing greater flexibility while maintaining strict control and a complete audit trail for each transaction, wherever it is processed.
“One of the significant challenges of image capture at the point of presentment is the need to standardize rules, processes and practices across remote offices. Otherwise, users may not get the full advantage of remote capture,” Vogel said. “This may require a thorough business analysis and a willingness to unify business processes.”
What do you think? E-mail me at m_brousseau@msn.com.
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Small Banks Seek Lockbox Solutions
By Mark Brousseau
Demand from community and mid-sized banks for image-based lockbox solutions is on the upswing, says Bob Pangrac (rpangrac@creditron.com), national account manager for bank lockbox providers at Creditron. The reason? Smaller banks are looking to defend their commercial account base from large “national banks,” which Pangrac says are now showing up in regional and small markets with cash management services such as wholesale and retail lockbox processing.
“Previously, the cost of an image-based payments solution was cost-prohibitive for a smaller financial institution,” Pangrac told me. “With the introduction of Microsoft-based solutions, smaller banks can now afford a solution that will provide new revenue streams for the bank.”
But why not outsource?
One reason is that banks can keep more of the revenue from their lockbox services, Pangrac said. Another factor is that in-house systems offer better cost-controls than outsourced providers. Finally, in-house systems allow banks to clear exceptions “as they happen” or at the end of the day, rather than waiting for them to arrive from the outsource provider. “With an in-house system, exceptions can be handled the same processing day, benefiting the bank and the bank’s customer – retail or commercial – alike,” he explained.
As an example, Pangrac recounts the story of a $250 million bank that sensed that they were experiencing holdover with their lockbox provider. “By bringing their lockbox processing in-house, they seldom have holdover, which translates into more efficient customer service, deposit management, and cash management. The bank can also handle their ‘on-us’ accounts, such as the bank-branded Visa card, and their home and car loans,” Pangrac said.
So what functions are smaller banks looking for in image-based lockbox systems? Pangrac said ease of use tops the list, followed by ease of account setup, an R&D path for electronic payments, and the ability for customers to research items and receive invoices via the Web.
Are you a small bank that has successfully deployed an image-based lockbox solution? E-mail me at m_brousseau@msn.com.
Demand from community and mid-sized banks for image-based lockbox solutions is on the upswing, says Bob Pangrac (rpangrac@creditron.com), national account manager for bank lockbox providers at Creditron. The reason? Smaller banks are looking to defend their commercial account base from large “national banks,” which Pangrac says are now showing up in regional and small markets with cash management services such as wholesale and retail lockbox processing.
“Previously, the cost of an image-based payments solution was cost-prohibitive for a smaller financial institution,” Pangrac told me. “With the introduction of Microsoft-based solutions, smaller banks can now afford a solution that will provide new revenue streams for the bank.”
But why not outsource?
One reason is that banks can keep more of the revenue from their lockbox services, Pangrac said. Another factor is that in-house systems offer better cost-controls than outsourced providers. Finally, in-house systems allow banks to clear exceptions “as they happen” or at the end of the day, rather than waiting for them to arrive from the outsource provider. “With an in-house system, exceptions can be handled the same processing day, benefiting the bank and the bank’s customer – retail or commercial – alike,” he explained.
As an example, Pangrac recounts the story of a $250 million bank that sensed that they were experiencing holdover with their lockbox provider. “By bringing their lockbox processing in-house, they seldom have holdover, which translates into more efficient customer service, deposit management, and cash management. The bank can also handle their ‘on-us’ accounts, such as the bank-branded Visa card, and their home and car loans,” Pangrac said.
So what functions are smaller banks looking for in image-based lockbox systems? Pangrac said ease of use tops the list, followed by ease of account setup, an R&D path for electronic payments, and the ability for customers to research items and receive invoices via the Web.
Are you a small bank that has successfully deployed an image-based lockbox solution? E-mail me at m_brousseau@msn.com.
Friday, February 9, 2007
Transition to Remote Capture Helps Drive Increased Demand for Low-Volume, Image-Based Remittance Solutions
By Mark Brousseau
While many industry observers describe the market for high-volume remittance solutions as sluggish, the market for low-volume, image-based remittance solutions is going strong, especially among organizations that process less than 5,000 payments a day. Wally Vogel, president and founder of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada-based Creditron, Inc., believes the low-volume market will not only stay strong, but also will likely see accelerated growth.
Creditron expects solid growth in 2007, Vogel noted, adding that the company has received so many orders already that it is expanding operations to keep up. What’s more, Vogel said Creditron’s level of inquiries and interest from prospective clients is higher than ever, which bodes well for the future. The interest is coming from all of the vertical markets Creditron serves, including government, utilities, insurance, banking, newspapers and non-profits.
To what does Vogel attribute this growth? One factor is the transition to remote deposit capture, which is increasing demand for image-based remittance solutions. “In the past, organizations had three options for processing remittance payments: in-house manual processing, in-house automated processing, and outsourced lockbox processing,” Vogel explained. “For those organizations that decide to take advantage of remote deposit, option No. 1 no longer is available: the Fed accepts images, but it won’t accept hand-drawn facsimiles. Checks will need to be scanned, and that means imaging equipment and software that can also be used to facilitate automation.” Since the majority of low-volume remittance operations currently process manually, there will be a significant drive toward imaging and automation – whether that means purchasing an in-house system or outsourcing to a lockbox.
Additionally, more low-volume remittance processors are discovering the business benefits of automating with image technology. Vogel noted that, “The benefits of automation and remote deposit apply to any organization that receives payments, although each vertical has its own unique needs which need to be addressed. We find clients are looking for increasing levels of automation through advanced recognition technologies, software features that handle complex business rules, and automation of reporting, A/R updates, and other functions. They want technology that requires little if any human intervention to handle the remittance process.”
Vogel will be speaking at TAWPI’s Payments in Transition conference in March.
Mark Brousseau is the facilitator of TAWPI’s Payments Capture & Clearing Council and Forms Processing Leadership Council. He also is president of Brousseau & Associates, a strategic marketing and PR firm specializing in the payments and document automation arenas. Brousseau can be reached at 717-767-2574 or via m_brousseau@msn.com.
# # #
While many industry observers describe the market for high-volume remittance solutions as sluggish, the market for low-volume, image-based remittance solutions is going strong, especially among organizations that process less than 5,000 payments a day. Wally Vogel, president and founder of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada-based Creditron, Inc., believes the low-volume market will not only stay strong, but also will likely see accelerated growth.
Creditron expects solid growth in 2007, Vogel noted, adding that the company has received so many orders already that it is expanding operations to keep up. What’s more, Vogel said Creditron’s level of inquiries and interest from prospective clients is higher than ever, which bodes well for the future. The interest is coming from all of the vertical markets Creditron serves, including government, utilities, insurance, banking, newspapers and non-profits.
To what does Vogel attribute this growth? One factor is the transition to remote deposit capture, which is increasing demand for image-based remittance solutions. “In the past, organizations had three options for processing remittance payments: in-house manual processing, in-house automated processing, and outsourced lockbox processing,” Vogel explained. “For those organizations that decide to take advantage of remote deposit, option No. 1 no longer is available: the Fed accepts images, but it won’t accept hand-drawn facsimiles. Checks will need to be scanned, and that means imaging equipment and software that can also be used to facilitate automation.” Since the majority of low-volume remittance operations currently process manually, there will be a significant drive toward imaging and automation – whether that means purchasing an in-house system or outsourcing to a lockbox.
Additionally, more low-volume remittance processors are discovering the business benefits of automating with image technology. Vogel noted that, “The benefits of automation and remote deposit apply to any organization that receives payments, although each vertical has its own unique needs which need to be addressed. We find clients are looking for increasing levels of automation through advanced recognition technologies, software features that handle complex business rules, and automation of reporting, A/R updates, and other functions. They want technology that requires little if any human intervention to handle the remittance process.”
Vogel will be speaking at TAWPI’s Payments in Transition conference in March.
Mark Brousseau is the facilitator of TAWPI’s Payments Capture & Clearing Council and Forms Processing Leadership Council. He also is president of Brousseau & Associates, a strategic marketing and PR firm specializing in the payments and document automation arenas. Brousseau can be reached at 717-767-2574 or via m_brousseau@msn.com.
# # #
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
